Odd-Even Scheme in Delhi to Run Its Course Till January 15 as Planned
car&bike Team
1 min read
Jan 11, 2016, 09:03 PM
The Delhi High Court said on Monday that the AAP government's odd-even vehicle scheme to control rising air pollution in the capital city will continue till January 15 as planned.
The court said it would "not interfere with the notification" that allows only cars with odd-numbered licence plates on Delhi's roads on odd-numbered dates, and those with even-numbered plates on the other days till this Friday.
The court, however, directed the government to take into consideration the contents of the petitions, which had challenged the government's scheme, before taking any further action.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said, though the implementation of the scheme may have caused hardship to a section of society, "power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine correctness of such policy decision".
"Keeping in view that restrictions under notification are only for a limited period of 15 days and it is stated that the scheme has been enforced as a pilot project to ascertain the reduction, if any, of pollution levels, we are of the view that interference by this court is not warranted," it said.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula to Keep Nearly 10 Lakh Private Vehicles Off the Road in Delhi
The court also said in its 12-page order, "Implementation may have caused hardship to a section of the society, however, the power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine the correctness of such a policy decision or to find out whether there could be more appropriate or better alternatives.
"It's neither within domain of the courts nor the scope of judicial review to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise or whether a better public policy can be evolved as suggested by petitioners," the bench added.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula: The Exemptions
It also observed that "law is well settled that on matters affecting policy, courts will not interfere unless the policy is unconstitutional or contrary to statutory provisions or arbitrary or irrational or in abuse of power."
"Since, the policy decisions are taken based on expert knowledge of the persons concerned, courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision," the bench said.
On January 8, the High Court had reserved its order on the pleas challenging the scheme after the Delhi government defended its stand on the issue, saying per capita toxic gas emission had declined due to lesser number of cars on city roads.
Also Read - Odd-Even Rule: Violators Will Not Be Allowed to Park in Delhi
The High Court had earlier questioned the impact of the odd-even operation on pollution and asked the AAP government to consider restricting the programme, slated for a fortnight till January 15, to a week.
The court's order came on a bunch of petitions filed by various individuals, including lawyers, who had challenged the AAP government's December 28, 2015 notification to impose the scheme.
The petitions had contended that the AAP government carried out a pick-and-choose policy against car owners, whereas 46 per cent pollution was caused by trucks.
Delhi High Court Bar Association President Rajiv Khosla, one of the petitioners, said the data submitted by the city government was not correct and the particulate matter across the capital showed a rising trend despite the scheme being in place since January 1.
Defending the scheme, the government had said it aimed at reducing congestion on the capital's roads that has further contributed towards lowering of pollution.
The AAP government has contended that particulate and nitrogen-oxide load from cars have come down during the odd-even programme by as much as 40 per cent and there have been benefits due to the reduction in the number of diesel cars.
The court said it would "not interfere with the notification" that allows only cars with odd-numbered licence plates on Delhi's roads on odd-numbered dates, and those with even-numbered plates on the other days till this Friday.
The court, however, directed the government to take into consideration the contents of the petitions, which had challenged the government's scheme, before taking any further action.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said, though the implementation of the scheme may have caused hardship to a section of society, "power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine correctness of such policy decision".
"Keeping in view that restrictions under notification are only for a limited period of 15 days and it is stated that the scheme has been enforced as a pilot project to ascertain the reduction, if any, of pollution levels, we are of the view that interference by this court is not warranted," it said.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula to Keep Nearly 10 Lakh Private Vehicles Off the Road in Delhi
The court also said in its 12-page order, "Implementation may have caused hardship to a section of the society, however, the power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine the correctness of such a policy decision or to find out whether there could be more appropriate or better alternatives.
"It's neither within domain of the courts nor the scope of judicial review to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise or whether a better public policy can be evolved as suggested by petitioners," the bench added.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula: The Exemptions
It also observed that "law is well settled that on matters affecting policy, courts will not interfere unless the policy is unconstitutional or contrary to statutory provisions or arbitrary or irrational or in abuse of power."
"Since, the policy decisions are taken based on expert knowledge of the persons concerned, courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision," the bench said.
On January 8, the High Court had reserved its order on the pleas challenging the scheme after the Delhi government defended its stand on the issue, saying per capita toxic gas emission had declined due to lesser number of cars on city roads.
Also Read - Odd-Even Rule: Violators Will Not Be Allowed to Park in Delhi
The High Court had earlier questioned the impact of the odd-even operation on pollution and asked the AAP government to consider restricting the programme, slated for a fortnight till January 15, to a week.
The court's order came on a bunch of petitions filed by various individuals, including lawyers, who had challenged the AAP government's December 28, 2015 notification to impose the scheme.
The petitions had contended that the AAP government carried out a pick-and-choose policy against car owners, whereas 46 per cent pollution was caused by trucks.
Delhi High Court Bar Association President Rajiv Khosla, one of the petitioners, said the data submitted by the city government was not correct and the particulate matter across the capital showed a rising trend despite the scheme being in place since January 1.
Defending the scheme, the government had said it aimed at reducing congestion on the capital's roads that has further contributed towards lowering of pollution.
The AAP government has contended that particulate and nitrogen-oxide load from cars have come down during the odd-even programme by as much as 40 per cent and there have been benefits due to the reduction in the number of diesel cars.
Related News
Latest Cars
Upcoming Cars
Latest News
Jaiveer Mehra | Jan 29, 2026Tesla Model S, Model X Production To End By Mid-2026Company CEO Elon Musk made the announcement during the company’s Q4 2025 earnings call.3 mins read
car&bike Team | Jan 29, 2026Mahindra Vision S SUV Interior Spied For The First TimeTest mules of the boxy SUV were initially spotted on public roads in mid 2025, with the concept debuting in August.1 min read
car&bike Team | Jan 29, 2026Hyundai Exter Facelift Spied Testing Ahead Of India DebutUpdated Exter is expected to make its debut later in the year as Hyundai will look to better compete with the Punch.1 min read
Janak Sorap | Jan 29, 20262023 World Superbike Championship-winning Ducati Panigale V4 R: Photo GalleryThis one is not tribute bike or a factory replica, but the very machine ridden by Álvaro Bautista during his record-breaking WorldSBK title in the 2023 season.1 min read
car&bike Team | Jan 29, 2026Skoda Kylaq Crosses 50,000 Units Production MilestoneThe sub-compact SUV has played a major role in Skoda’s 107 per cent sales growth in 2025.2 mins read
Janak Sorap | Jan 29, 2026KTM 390 Adventure R Launched in India at Rs. 3.78 LakhKTM has quietly expanded its adventure lineup in India with the launch of the more off-road-focused 390 Adventure R.1 min read
Bilal Firfiray | Jan 21, 2026Tata Punch Facelift Review: New Turbo Engine; Same Old SoulWith the update, the Tata Punch facelift retains its character of being a healthy runabout, which is perfect for Indian roads. But have these changes made it any better?7 mins read
Amaan Ahmed | Jan 17, 2026Bajaj Chetak C25 First Ride Review: Basic, Likeable E-Scooter For First-Time RidersThe Chetak C25, in quite a few ways, is poles apart from the larger and more powerful 30 and 35 Series models, but in its mannerisms, it is very much a Chetak.8 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | Jan 9, 2026Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder: 10,000 km Long-Term ReviewAfter spending over three months and 10,000 km with the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder Hybrid, we were impressed by its real-world mileage, seamless hybrid, practical comfort, and Toyota reliability. Is it the best C-SUV then?5 mins read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Jan 8, 20262026 Mahindra XUV 7XO Review: Big On Tech, Bigger On ComfortThe new Mahindra XUV 7XO is flashier, feature packed, and comes with more advanced tech. But are the changes just incremental or actually substantial?1 min read
Preetam Bora | Jan 10, 2026Simple One Gen 2 First Ride Review: 265 km Claimed Range!The Gen 2 model of Simple Energy’s first electric scooter gets a fair few updates, including new features, tech, more range and lighter weight. We spent a couple of hours with the Simple One Gen 2 to find out if it manages to impress.6 mins read