Odd-Even Scheme in Delhi to Run Its Course Till January 15 as Planned
car&bike Team
1 min read
Jan 11, 2016, 09:03 PM
The Delhi High Court said on Monday that the AAP government's odd-even vehicle scheme to control rising air pollution in the capital city will continue till January 15 as planned.
The court said it would "not interfere with the notification" that allows only cars with odd-numbered licence plates on Delhi's roads on odd-numbered dates, and those with even-numbered plates on the other days till this Friday.
The court, however, directed the government to take into consideration the contents of the petitions, which had challenged the government's scheme, before taking any further action.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said, though the implementation of the scheme may have caused hardship to a section of society, "power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine correctness of such policy decision".
"Keeping in view that restrictions under notification are only for a limited period of 15 days and it is stated that the scheme has been enforced as a pilot project to ascertain the reduction, if any, of pollution levels, we are of the view that interference by this court is not warranted," it said.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula to Keep Nearly 10 Lakh Private Vehicles Off the Road in Delhi
The court also said in its 12-page order, "Implementation may have caused hardship to a section of the society, however, the power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine the correctness of such a policy decision or to find out whether there could be more appropriate or better alternatives.
"It's neither within domain of the courts nor the scope of judicial review to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise or whether a better public policy can be evolved as suggested by petitioners," the bench added.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula: The Exemptions
It also observed that "law is well settled that on matters affecting policy, courts will not interfere unless the policy is unconstitutional or contrary to statutory provisions or arbitrary or irrational or in abuse of power."
"Since, the policy decisions are taken based on expert knowledge of the persons concerned, courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision," the bench said.
On January 8, the High Court had reserved its order on the pleas challenging the scheme after the Delhi government defended its stand on the issue, saying per capita toxic gas emission had declined due to lesser number of cars on city roads.
Also Read - Odd-Even Rule: Violators Will Not Be Allowed to Park in Delhi
The High Court had earlier questioned the impact of the odd-even operation on pollution and asked the AAP government to consider restricting the programme, slated for a fortnight till January 15, to a week.
The court's order came on a bunch of petitions filed by various individuals, including lawyers, who had challenged the AAP government's December 28, 2015 notification to impose the scheme.
The petitions had contended that the AAP government carried out a pick-and-choose policy against car owners, whereas 46 per cent pollution was caused by trucks.
Delhi High Court Bar Association President Rajiv Khosla, one of the petitioners, said the data submitted by the city government was not correct and the particulate matter across the capital showed a rising trend despite the scheme being in place since January 1.
Defending the scheme, the government had said it aimed at reducing congestion on the capital's roads that has further contributed towards lowering of pollution.
The AAP government has contended that particulate and nitrogen-oxide load from cars have come down during the odd-even programme by as much as 40 per cent and there have been benefits due to the reduction in the number of diesel cars.
The court said it would "not interfere with the notification" that allows only cars with odd-numbered licence plates on Delhi's roads on odd-numbered dates, and those with even-numbered plates on the other days till this Friday.
The court, however, directed the government to take into consideration the contents of the petitions, which had challenged the government's scheme, before taking any further action.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said, though the implementation of the scheme may have caused hardship to a section of society, "power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine correctness of such policy decision".
"Keeping in view that restrictions under notification are only for a limited period of 15 days and it is stated that the scheme has been enforced as a pilot project to ascertain the reduction, if any, of pollution levels, we are of the view that interference by this court is not warranted," it said.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula to Keep Nearly 10 Lakh Private Vehicles Off the Road in Delhi
The court also said in its 12-page order, "Implementation may have caused hardship to a section of the society, however, the power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine the correctness of such a policy decision or to find out whether there could be more appropriate or better alternatives.
"It's neither within domain of the courts nor the scope of judicial review to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise or whether a better public policy can be evolved as suggested by petitioners," the bench added.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula: The Exemptions
It also observed that "law is well settled that on matters affecting policy, courts will not interfere unless the policy is unconstitutional or contrary to statutory provisions or arbitrary or irrational or in abuse of power."
"Since, the policy decisions are taken based on expert knowledge of the persons concerned, courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision," the bench said.
On January 8, the High Court had reserved its order on the pleas challenging the scheme after the Delhi government defended its stand on the issue, saying per capita toxic gas emission had declined due to lesser number of cars on city roads.
Also Read - Odd-Even Rule: Violators Will Not Be Allowed to Park in Delhi
The High Court had earlier questioned the impact of the odd-even operation on pollution and asked the AAP government to consider restricting the programme, slated for a fortnight till January 15, to a week.
The court's order came on a bunch of petitions filed by various individuals, including lawyers, who had challenged the AAP government's December 28, 2015 notification to impose the scheme.
The petitions had contended that the AAP government carried out a pick-and-choose policy against car owners, whereas 46 per cent pollution was caused by trucks.
Delhi High Court Bar Association President Rajiv Khosla, one of the petitioners, said the data submitted by the city government was not correct and the particulate matter across the capital showed a rising trend despite the scheme being in place since January 1.
Defending the scheme, the government had said it aimed at reducing congestion on the capital's roads that has further contributed towards lowering of pollution.
The AAP government has contended that particulate and nitrogen-oxide load from cars have come down during the odd-even programme by as much as 40 per cent and there have been benefits due to the reduction in the number of diesel cars.
Related News
Latest Cars
Upcoming Cars
Latest News
Amaan Ahmed | Apr 29, 2026Volkswagen ID.Polo EV Revealed With Up To 208 BHP, 454 KM RangeThe first-ever Polo to be offered with an all-electric powertrain, the ID.Polo is built on Volkswagen's MEB+ architecture.3 mins read
Carandbike Team | Apr 29, 2026Renault Triber Now Gets Auto Climate Control, One-Touch Second-Row Folding Seat & MoreThe updated Triber is now dearer by up to Rs 9,0002 mins read
car&bike Team | Apr 29, 2026New 720 kW EV Charging Station Opens On Mumbai-Pune ExpresswayThe charging station, comprising 5 dispensers and 10 charging points, is located at the food mall at the Khalapur rest halt on the expressway.2 mins read
Amaan Ahmed | Apr 29, 2026Bajaj Chetak C3501 Gains Google Maps Integration, More Power; Price Hiked To Rs 1.39 LakhThanks to increased peak power output across the Chetak range, the top-of-the-line C3501 now has a claimed top speed of 80 kmph.3 mins read
car&bike Team | Apr 29, 2026Updated Keeway V302C Launched At Rs. 4.22 LakhThe Keeway V302C has been launched in a new yellow colour option and is powered by a 298 cc, v-twin engine.1 min read
car&bike Team | Apr 28, 2026Maruti Suzuki Posts Record Sales In FY2026; 1.90 Lakh Bookings PendingIndia’s largest car brand has announced that it sold in record number of vehicles both in the previous financial year as well as first quarter of 20261 min read
Shams Raza Naqvi | Apr 29, 2026Toyota Innova Hycross Vs Mahindra XEV 9S: Choosing The Right Three Row Family MoverIn a battle of three-row cars the electric Mahindra XEV 9S takes on the Toyota Innova Hycross. Which one ticks more boxes?1 min read
Janak Sorap | Apr 26, 2026BMW F 450 GS First Ride Review: Almost A Proper GS With Big Bike DNANew 420cc twin, premium build, feature-loaded and Easy Ride Clutch — but does it deliver where it truly matters?8 mins read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Apr 25, 20262026 MG Majestor Review: Bold, Feature-Packed And Off-Road ReadyWe spent time with the MG Majestor to see how much of an improvement it is over the Gloster, and whether it can take on the segment leader – Toyota Fortuner.9 mins read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Apr 23, 2026Vega Bolt Bluetooth Smart Helmet Review: Smart, Simple, And FunctionalThe Vega Bolt Bluetooth Smart Helmet is a practical take on connected riding gear, aimed at commuters and riders who want integrated functionality without the hassle of add-ons.6 mins read
Preetam Bora | Apr 20, 2026Hero Destini 110 Vs TVS Jupiter 110 Comparison ReviewThe Hero Destini 110 and the TVS Jupiter 110 both sit in the same price bracket and target the same buyer. But they take different approaches. Which 110 cc scooter should you buy?9 mins read